So we hope you can have a good understanding of the JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam torrent we provide, then you can pass you exam in your first attempt. Our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam prep is elaborately compiled and highly efficiently, it will cost you less time and energy, because we shouldn’t waste our money on some unless things. The passing rate and the hit rate are also very high, there are thousands of candidates choose to trust our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator guide torrent and they have passed the exam. We have a lot of regular customers for a long-term cooperation now since they have understood how useful and effective our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator actual exam is. In order to let you have a general idea about the shining points of our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator training materials, i would like to introduce the free demos of our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator study engine for you. Our {JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam torrent has a high quality that you can’t expect.
It all starts from our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator learning questions.
Our JN0-643 - Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) Vce Test Simulator study materials can satisfy their wishes and they only spare little time to prepare for exam. When you see other people in different industry who feel relaxed with high salary, do you want to try another field? And is the difficulty of learning a new piece of knowledge often deterring you? It doesn't matter, now Free JN0-643 Practice practice exam offers you a great opportunity to enter a new industry. Our Free JN0-643 Practice learning material was compiled from the wisdom and sweat of many industry experts.
Are you staying up for the JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam day and night? Do you have no free time to contact with your friends and families because of preparing for the exam? Are you tired of preparing for different kinds of exams? If your answer is yes, please buy our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam questions, which is equipped with a high quality. We can make sure that our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator study materials have the ability to help you solve your problem, and you will not be troubled by these questions above.
Juniper JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator - They are quite convenient.
With the rapid development of the world economy, it has been universally accepted that a growing number of people have longed to become the social elite. However, the competition of becoming the social elite is fierce for all people. The JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator latest dumps will be a shortcut for a lot of people who desire to be the social elite. If you try your best to prepare for the JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator exam and get the related certification in a short time, it will be easier for you to receive the attention from many leaders of the big company, and it also will be very easy for many people to get a decent job in the labor market by the JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator learning guide.
We have the confidence and ability to make you finally have rich rewards. Our JN0-643 Vce Test Simulator learning materials provide you with a platform of knowledge to help you achieve your wishes.
JN0-643 PDF DEMO:
QUESTION NO: 1
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, Host2 is the only host currently joining group 231.1.1.1, but S1 is still flooding the traffic to all hosts on VLAN 100.
What feature can be configured on S1 to limit the multicast flooding of traffic to only interested hosts on VLAN 100?
A. Multicast scoping
B. IGMP snooping
C. Multicast VLAN registration
D. IGMP immediate leave
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 2
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the provider bridges are using Q-in-Q tunneling to tunnel VLAN 100 traffic over VLAN
200.
What is the correct VLAN configuration for Q-in-Q tunneling on Provider Bridge A?
A. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
B. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
C. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/10.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
D. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 200;
}
}
}
Answer: A
QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to load-balance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
B. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}
C. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit --
user@router> show class-of-service scheduler-map two
Scheduler map: two, Index: 56974
Scheduler: sch-best-effort, Forwarding class: best-effort, Index: 26057
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: exact, Buffer sizE. remainder,
Buffer Limit: exact, Priority: low
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Scheduler: sch-expedited-forwarding, Forwarding class:
expedited-forwarding, Index: 10026
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: none, Buffer sizE. 1 percent,
Buffer Limit: none, Priority: high
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "CoS Information"
CoS information:
Direction : Output
CoS transmit queue Bandwidth Buffer
Priority Limit
% bps % usec
0 best-effort 1 10000000 r 0
low exact
1 expedited-forwarding 1 10000000 1 0
high none
Logical interface ge-0/0/1.823 (Index 74) (SNMP ifIndex 506) (Generation 139)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.823 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 1820224529
Output bytes : 6505980
Input packets: 1436371
Output packets: 75905
(... output truncated ...)
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "Queue Counters"
Queue counters: Queued packets Transmitted packets Dropped packets
0 best-effort 1343970 1343970 7105
1 expedited-fo 53987 53987
0
2 assured-forw 0 0
0
3 network-cont 0 0
0
Queue number: Mapped forwarding classes
0 best-effort
1 expedited-forwarding
2 assured-forwarding
3 network-control
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
(... output truncated ...)
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Based on the configuration in the exhibit, why are you seeing drops in the best-effort queue on the
SRX Series platform?
A. The drop-profile fill level is set too low.
B. Packets are dropped by a firewall policy.
C. The best-effort queue is being shaped.
D. The scheduler is not being applied correctly.
Answer: C
QUESTION NO: 5
You are asked to configure an interface policer. You must ensure when the bandwidth limit and burst size are exceeded, that the packet receives a CoS parameter which increases the probability that the packet will be dropped if the queues are congested.
Which policer action will accomplish this requirement?
A. dscp 0
B. loss-priority high
C. ip-precedence 0
D. loss-priority low
Answer: B
PECB Lead-Cybersecurity-Manager - It means you can try our demo and you do not need to spend any money. In this case, we need a professional Salesforce CRT-450 certification, which will help us stand out of the crowd and knock out the door of great company. Huawei H11-861_V4.0 - There are a lot of experts and professors in the field in our company. HP HPE0-J68 - You can see the high pass rate as 98% to 100%, which is unmarched in the market. Dell D-PWF-OE-A-00 - More importantly, the demo from our company is free for all people.
Updated: May 28, 2022