They are the versions of the PDF, Software and APP online. If you visit our website on our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine exam braindumps, then you may find that there are the respective features and detailed disparities of our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine simulating questions. And you can free donwload the demos to have a look. So every year a large number of people take JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine tests to prove their abilities. But even the best people fail sometimes. Our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine real questions can offer major help this time.
JNCIP JN0-643 At first, it can be only used on PC.
The Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) prepare torrent is absorbed in the advantages of the traditional learning platform and realize their shortcomings, so as to develop the JN0-643 - Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) Intereactive Testing Engine test material more suitable for users of various cultural levels. Our Latest JN0-643 Exam Testking free dumps demo will provide you some basic information for the accuracy of our exam materials. All questions and answers in our Latest JN0-643 Exam Testking real dumps are tested by our certified trainers with rich experience and one or two days is enough for you practicing valid Latest JN0-643 Exam Testking exam pdf.
We will send our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine exam guide within 10 minutes after your payment. You can check your mailbox ten minutes after payment to see if our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine exam guide are in. What we attach importance to in the transaction of latest JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine quiz prep is for your consideration about high quality and efficient products and time-saving service.
Juniper JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine - You’ve heard it right.
Having been handling in this line for more than ten years, we can assure you that our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine study questions are of best quality and reasonable prices for your information. We offer free demos of the latest version covering all details of our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine exam braindumps available at present as representatives. So JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine practice materials come within the scope of our business activities. Choose our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine learning guide, you won't regret!
You can totally rely on us! We never concoct any praise but show our capacity by the efficiency and profession of our JN0-643 Intereactive Testing Engine practice materials.
JN0-643 PDF DEMO:
QUESTION NO: 1
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, Host2 is the only host currently joining group 231.1.1.1, but S1 is still flooding the traffic to all hosts on VLAN 100.
What feature can be configured on S1 to limit the multicast flooding of traffic to only interested hosts on VLAN 100?
A. Multicast scoping
B. IGMP snooping
C. Multicast VLAN registration
D. IGMP immediate leave
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 2
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to load-balance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
B. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}
C. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the provider bridges are using Q-in-Q tunneling to tunnel VLAN 100 traffic over VLAN
200.
What is the correct VLAN configuration for Q-in-Q tunneling on Provider Bridge A?
A. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
B. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
C. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/10.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
D. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 200;
}
}
}
Answer: A
QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit --
user@router> show class-of-service scheduler-map two
Scheduler map: two, Index: 56974
Scheduler: sch-best-effort, Forwarding class: best-effort, Index: 26057
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: exact, Buffer sizE. remainder,
Buffer Limit: exact, Priority: low
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Scheduler: sch-expedited-forwarding, Forwarding class:
expedited-forwarding, Index: 10026
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: none, Buffer sizE. 1 percent,
Buffer Limit: none, Priority: high
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "CoS Information"
CoS information:
Direction : Output
CoS transmit queue Bandwidth Buffer
Priority Limit
% bps % usec
0 best-effort 1 10000000 r 0
low exact
1 expedited-forwarding 1 10000000 1 0
high none
Logical interface ge-0/0/1.823 (Index 74) (SNMP ifIndex 506) (Generation 139)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.823 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 1820224529
Output bytes : 6505980
Input packets: 1436371
Output packets: 75905
(... output truncated ...)
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "Queue Counters"
Queue counters: Queued packets Transmitted packets Dropped packets
0 best-effort 1343970 1343970 7105
1 expedited-fo 53987 53987
0
2 assured-forw 0 0
0
3 network-cont 0 0
0
Queue number: Mapped forwarding classes
0 best-effort
1 expedited-forwarding
2 assured-forwarding
3 network-control
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
(... output truncated ...)
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Based on the configuration in the exhibit, why are you seeing drops in the best-effort queue on the
SRX Series platform?
A. The drop-profile fill level is set too low.
B. Packets are dropped by a firewall policy.
C. The best-effort queue is being shaped.
D. The scheduler is not being applied correctly.
Answer: C
QUESTION NO: 5
You are asked to configure an interface policer. You must ensure when the bandwidth limit and burst size are exceeded, that the packet receives a CoS parameter which increases the probability that the packet will be dropped if the queues are congested.
Which policer action will accomplish this requirement?
A. dscp 0
B. loss-priority high
C. ip-precedence 0
D. loss-priority low
Answer: B
Oracle 1z0-1066-24 study engine is very attentive to provide a demo for all customers who concerned about our products, whose purpose is to allow customers to understand our product content before purchase. The latest Juniper JN0-280 quiz torrent can directly lead you to the success of your career. If you have any questions after you buy our SAP C-THR92-2405 study guide, you can always get thoughtful support and help by email or online inquiry. The PDF version of our PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor test braindumps provide demo for customers; you will have the right to download the demo for free if you choose to use the PDF version. Microsoft MB-230 - We only use the certificated experts and published authors to compile our study materials and our products boost the practice test software to test the clients’ ability to answer the questions.
Updated: May 28, 2022