It contains the comprehensive JN0-643 Registration exam questions that are not difficult to understand. By using these aids you will be able to modify your skills to the required limits. Your JN0-643 Registration certification success is just a step away and is secured with 100% money back guarantee. JN0-643 Registration guide torrent has a first-rate team of experts, advanced learning concepts and a complete learning model. You give us a trust and we reward you for a better future. If you are always complaining that you are too spread, are overwhelmed with the job at hand, and struggle to figure out how to prioritize your efforts, these would be the basic problem of low efficiency and production.
JNCIP JN0-643 So just open our websites in your computer.
JNCIP JN0-643 Registration - Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) As the talent team grows, every fighter must own an extra technical skill to stand out from the crowd. And we will try our best to satisfy our customers with better quatily and services. Our loyal customers give our JN0-643 Guaranteed Success exam materials strong support.
How to get the test JN0-643 Registration certification in a short time, which determines enough qualification certificates to test our learning ability and application level. This may be a contradiction of the problem, we hope to be able to spend less time and energy to take into account the test JN0-643 Registration certification, but the qualification examination of the learning process is very wasted energy, so how to achieve the balance? Our JN0-643 Registration exam prep can be done with its high-efficient merit. Try it now!
Juniper JN0-643 Registration - Trust us and give yourself a chance to success!
Our JN0-643 Registration training materials are regarded as the most excellent practice materials by authority. Our company is dedicated to researching, manufacturing, selling and service of the JN0-643 Registration study guide. Also, we have our own research center and experts team. So our products can quickly meet the new demands of customers. That is why our JN0-643 Registration exam questions are popular among candidates. we have strong strenght to support our JN0-643 Registration practice engine.
There are so many advantages of our JN0-643 Registration actual exam, and you are welcome to have a try! We have put substantial amount of money and effort into upgrading the quality of our JN0-643 Registration preparation materials, into our own JN0-643 Registration sales force and into our after sale services.
JN0-643 PDF DEMO:
QUESTION NO: 1
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to load-balance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
B. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}
C. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 2
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, Host2 is the only host currently joining group 231.1.1.1, but S1 is still flooding the traffic to all hosts on VLAN 100.
What feature can be configured on S1 to limit the multicast flooding of traffic to only interested hosts on VLAN 100?
A. Multicast scoping
B. IGMP snooping
C. Multicast VLAN registration
D. IGMP immediate leave
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the provider bridges are using Q-in-Q tunneling to tunnel VLAN 100 traffic over VLAN
200.
What is the correct VLAN configuration for Q-in-Q tunneling on Provider Bridge A?
A. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
B. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
C. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/10.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
D. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 200;
}
}
}
Answer: A
QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit --
user@router> show class-of-service scheduler-map two
Scheduler map: two, Index: 56974
Scheduler: sch-best-effort, Forwarding class: best-effort, Index: 26057
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: exact, Buffer sizE. remainder,
Buffer Limit: exact, Priority: low
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Scheduler: sch-expedited-forwarding, Forwarding class:
expedited-forwarding, Index: 10026
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: none, Buffer sizE. 1 percent,
Buffer Limit: none, Priority: high
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "CoS Information"
CoS information:
Direction : Output
CoS transmit queue Bandwidth Buffer
Priority Limit
% bps % usec
0 best-effort 1 10000000 r 0
low exact
1 expedited-forwarding 1 10000000 1 0
high none
Logical interface ge-0/0/1.823 (Index 74) (SNMP ifIndex 506) (Generation 139)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.823 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 1820224529
Output bytes : 6505980
Input packets: 1436371
Output packets: 75905
(... output truncated ...)
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "Queue Counters"
Queue counters: Queued packets Transmitted packets Dropped packets
0 best-effort 1343970 1343970 7105
1 expedited-fo 53987 53987
0
2 assured-forw 0 0
0
3 network-cont 0 0
0
Queue number: Mapped forwarding classes
0 best-effort
1 expedited-forwarding
2 assured-forwarding
3 network-control
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
(... output truncated ...)
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Based on the configuration in the exhibit, why are you seeing drops in the best-effort queue on the
SRX Series platform?
A. The drop-profile fill level is set too low.
B. Packets are dropped by a firewall policy.
C. The best-effort queue is being shaped.
D. The scheduler is not being applied correctly.
Answer: C
QUESTION NO: 5
You are asked to configure an interface policer. You must ensure when the bandwidth limit and burst size are exceeded, that the packet receives a CoS parameter which increases the probability that the packet will be dropped if the queues are congested.
Which policer action will accomplish this requirement?
A. dscp 0
B. loss-priority high
C. ip-precedence 0
D. loss-priority low
Answer: B
Microsoft AZ-120 - Time is flying and the exam date is coming along, which is sort of intimidating considering your status of review process. No other EMC D-PE-OE-23 study materials or study dumps can bring you the knowledge and preparation that you will get from the EMC D-PE-OE-23 study materials available only from Omgzlook. IBM C1000-107 - It will add more colors to your life. Our experts have great familiarity with SAP C-HAMOD-2404 real exam in this area. Omgzlook will provide all the latest and accurate exam practice questions and answers for the staff to participate in Microsoft AI-900-CN certification exam.
Updated: May 28, 2022