We sincerely hope that you can pay more attention to our JN0-643 Preparation study questions. Although our company has designed the best and most suitable JN0-643 Preparation learn prep, we also do not stop our step to do research about the study materials. All experts and professors of our company have been trying their best to persist in innovate and developing the JN0-643 Preparation test training materials all the time in order to provide the best products for all people and keep competitive in the global market. We are happy to tell you that The Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) exam questions from our company will help you save time. With meticulous care design, our study materials will help all customers pass their exam in a shortest time. To avoid being washed out by the artificial intelligence, we must keep absorbing various new knowledge.
Our JN0-643 Preparation practice quiz is unique in the market.
JNCIP JN0-643 Preparation - Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) With our study materials, you only need 20-30 hours of study to successfully pass the exam and reach the peak of your career. All intricate points of our JN0-643 Latest Test Tips study guide will not be challenging anymore. They are harbingers of successful outcomes.
JN0-643 Preparation study guide not only apply to students, but also apply to office workers; not only apply to veterans in the workplace, but also apply to newly recruited newcomers. JN0-643 Preparation guide torrent uses a very simple and understandable language, to ensure that all people can read and understand. Are you still feeling distressed for expensive learning materials? Are you still struggling with complicated and difficult explanations in textbooks? Do you still hesitate in numerous tutorial materials? JN0-643 Preparation study guide can help you to solve all these questions.
Juniper JN0-643 Preparation - What is more, we offer customer services 24/7.
Obtaining the JN0-643 Preparation certification is not an easy task. Only a few people can pass it successfully. If you want to be one of them, please allow me to recommend the JN0-643 Preparation learning questions from our company to you, the superb quality of JN0-643 Preparation exam braindumps we've developed for has successfully helped thousands of candidates to realize their dreams. And our JN0-643 Preparation study materials have helped so many customers pass the exam.
If you are interested in JN0-643 Preparation exam material, you only need to enter our official website, and you can immediately download and experience our trial PDF file for free. Through the trial you will have different learning experience, you will find that what we say is not a lie, and you will immediately fall in love with our products.
JN0-643 PDF DEMO:
QUESTION NO: 1
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, Host2 is the only host currently joining group 231.1.1.1, but S1 is still flooding the traffic to all hosts on VLAN 100.
What feature can be configured on S1 to limit the multicast flooding of traffic to only interested hosts on VLAN 100?
A. Multicast scoping
B. IGMP snooping
C. Multicast VLAN registration
D. IGMP immediate leave
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 2
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the provider bridges are using Q-in-Q tunneling to tunnel VLAN 100 traffic over VLAN
200.
What is the correct VLAN configuration for Q-in-Q tunneling on Provider Bridge A?
A. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
B. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
C. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/10.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
D. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 200;
}
}
}
Answer: A
QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to load-balance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
B. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}
C. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Answer: B
QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit --
user@router> show class-of-service scheduler-map two
Scheduler map: two, Index: 56974
Scheduler: sch-best-effort, Forwarding class: best-effort, Index: 26057
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: exact, Buffer sizE. remainder,
Buffer Limit: exact, Priority: low
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Scheduler: sch-expedited-forwarding, Forwarding class:
expedited-forwarding, Index: 10026
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: none, Buffer sizE. 1 percent,
Buffer Limit: none, Priority: high
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "CoS Information"
CoS information:
Direction : Output
CoS transmit queue Bandwidth Buffer
Priority Limit
% bps % usec
0 best-effort 1 10000000 r 0
low exact
1 expedited-forwarding 1 10000000 1 0
high none
Logical interface ge-0/0/1.823 (Index 74) (SNMP ifIndex 506) (Generation 139)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.823 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 1820224529
Output bytes : 6505980
Input packets: 1436371
Output packets: 75905
(... output truncated ...)
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "Queue Counters"
Queue counters: Queued packets Transmitted packets Dropped packets
0 best-effort 1343970 1343970 7105
1 expedited-fo 53987 53987
0
2 assured-forw 0 0
0
3 network-cont 0 0
0
Queue number: Mapped forwarding classes
0 best-effort
1 expedited-forwarding
2 assured-forwarding
3 network-control
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
(... output truncated ...)
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Based on the configuration in the exhibit, why are you seeing drops in the best-effort queue on the
SRX Series platform?
A. The drop-profile fill level is set too low.
B. Packets are dropped by a firewall policy.
C. The best-effort queue is being shaped.
D. The scheduler is not being applied correctly.
Answer: C
QUESTION NO: 5
You are asked to configure an interface policer. You must ensure when the bandwidth limit and burst size are exceeded, that the packet receives a CoS parameter which increases the probability that the packet will be dropped if the queues are congested.
Which policer action will accomplish this requirement?
A. dscp 0
B. loss-priority high
C. ip-precedence 0
D. loss-priority low
Answer: B
If you want to pass your exam and get the Netskope NSK101 certification which is crucial for you successfully, I highly recommend that you should choose the Netskope NSK101 study materials from our company so that you can get a good understanding of the exam that you are going to prepare for. Microsoft MB-910 - Not only the content is the latest and valid information, but also the displays are varied and interesting. Once you have submitted your practice time, IIA IIA-CIA-Part1-CN learning Material system will automatically complete your operation. Adobe AD0-E207 - If you believe in our products this time, you will enjoy the happiness of success all your life IBM C1000-174 - So we have tried our best to develop the three packages for you to choose.
Updated: May 28, 2022