JN0-643 Pdf - Juniper Reliable Dumps Enterprise Routing And Switching, Professional (JNCIP ENT) Free Download - Omgzlook

You can now get Juniper JN0-643 Pdf exam certification our Omgzlook have the full version of Juniper JN0-643 Pdf exam. You do not need to look around for the latest Juniper JN0-643 Pdf training materials, because you have to find the best Juniper JN0-643 Pdf training materials. Rest assured that our questions and answers, you will be completely ready for the Juniper JN0-643 Pdf certification exam. If you are a novice, begin from JN0-643 Pdf study guide and revise your learning with the help of testing engine. JN0-643 Pdf Exam brain dumps are another superb offer of Omgzlook that is particularly helpful for those who want to the point and the most relevant content to pass JN0-643 Pdf exam. You do not need to attend the expensive training courses.

JNCIP JN0-643 We have benefited a lot from those changes.

Perhaps through Juniper JN0-643 - Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) Pdf exam you can promote yourself to the IT industry. In our software version of the Exam JN0-643 Preparation exam dumps, the unique point is that you can take part in the practice test before the real Exam JN0-643 Preparation exam. You never know what you can get till you try.

But God forced me to keep moving. Juniper JN0-643 Pdf exam is a major challenge in my life, so I am desperately trying to learn. But it does not matter, because I purchased Omgzlook's Juniper JN0-643 Pdf exam training materials.

Juniper JN0-643 Pdf - Your life will be even more exciting.

With all the questons and answers of our JN0-643 Pdf study materials, your success is 100% guaranteed. Moreover, we have Demos as freebies. The free demos give you a prove-evident and educated guess about the content of our JN0-643 Pdf practice questions. As long as you make up your mind on this JN0-643 Pdf exam, you can realize their profession is unquestionable. And you will be surprised to find the high-quality of our JN0-643 Pdf exam braindumps.

In order to meet the different need from our customers, the experts and professors from our company designed three different versions of our JN0-643 Pdf exam questions for our customers to choose, including the PDF version, the online version and the software version. Though the content of these three versions is the same, the displays have their different advantages.

JN0-643 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, Host2 is the only host currently joining group 231.1.1.1, but S1 is still flooding the traffic to all hosts on VLAN 100.
What feature can be configured on S1 to limit the multicast flooding of traffic to only interested hosts on VLAN 100?
A. Multicast scoping
B. IGMP snooping
C. Multicast VLAN registration
D. IGMP immediate leave
Answer: B

QUESTION NO: 2
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to load-balance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
B. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}
C. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D. {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65532;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Answer: B

QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the provider bridges are using Q-in-Q tunneling to tunnel VLAN 100 traffic over VLAN
200.
What is the correct VLAN configuration for Q-in-Q tunneling on Provider Bridge A?
A. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
B. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
C. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 200;
interface {
ge-0/0/10.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 100;
}
}
}
D. interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode access;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members test;
}
}
}
}
}
vlans {
test {
vlan-id 100;
interface {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
dot1q-tunneling {
customer-vlans 200;
}
}
}
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit --
user@router> show class-of-service scheduler-map two
Scheduler map: two, Index: 56974
Scheduler: sch-best-effort, Forwarding class: best-effort, Index: 26057
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: exact, Buffer sizE. remainder,
Buffer Limit: exact, Priority: low
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Scheduler: sch-expedited-forwarding, Forwarding class:
expedited-forwarding, Index: 10026
Transmit ratE. 1 percent, Rate Limit: none, Buffer sizE. 1 percent,
Buffer Limit: none, Priority: high
Excess Priority: unspecified
Drop profiles:
Loss priority Protocol Index Name
Low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium low any 1 <default-drop-profile>
Medium high any 1 <default-drop-profile>
High any 1 <default-drop-profile>
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "CoS Information"
CoS information:
Direction : Output
CoS transmit queue Bandwidth Buffer
Priority Limit
% bps % usec
0 best-effort 1 10000000 r 0
low exact
1 expedited-forwarding 1 10000000 1 0
high none
Logical interface ge-0/0/1.823 (Index 74) (SNMP ifIndex 506) (Generation 139)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.823 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 1820224529
Output bytes : 6505980
Input packets: 1436371
Output packets: 75905
(... output truncated ...)
user@router> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 extensive | find "Queue Counters"
Queue counters: Queued packets Transmitted packets Dropped packets
0 best-effort 1343970 1343970 7105
1 expedited-fo 53987 53987
0
2 assured-forw 0 0
0
3 network-cont 0 0
0
Queue number: Mapped forwarding classes
0 best-effort
1 expedited-forwarding
2 assured-forwarding
3 network-control
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
(... output truncated ...)
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Based on the configuration in the exhibit, why are you seeing drops in the best-effort queue on the
SRX Series platform?
A. The drop-profile fill level is set too low.
B. Packets are dropped by a firewall policy.
C. The best-effort queue is being shaped.
D. The scheduler is not being applied correctly.
Answer: C

QUESTION NO: 5
You are asked to configure an interface policer. You must ensure when the bandwidth limit and burst size are exceeded, that the packet receives a CoS parameter which increases the probability that the packet will be dropped if the queues are congested.
Which policer action will accomplish this requirement?
A. dscp 0
B. loss-priority high
C. ip-precedence 0
D. loss-priority low
Answer: B

Microsoft PL-600 - According to your need, you can choose the most suitable version of our Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) guide torrent for yourself. With our Dell D-AX-RH-A-00 exam Practice, you will feel much relax for the advantages of high-efficiency and accurate positioning on the content and formats according to the candidates’ interests and hobbies. Of course, a lot of problems such as soft test engine appeared some faults or abnormal stating run phenomenon of our Splunk SPLK-1002 exam question, these problems cannot be addressed by simple language, we will service a secure remote assistance for users and help users immediate effectively solve the existing problems of our Splunk SPLK-1002 torrent prep, thus greatly enhance the user experience, beneficial to protect the user's learning resources and use digital tools, let users in a safe and healthy environment to study Splunk SPLK-1002 exam question. CIPS L4M7 - We always put your needs in the first place. Fortinet FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 - They can not only achieve this, but ingeniously help you remember more content at the same time.

Updated: May 28, 2022